News From Multiple Perspectives

Rafizi Ramli warns of potential electricity price hikes due to gas supply decline

Published September 21, 2026 at 8:32 AM UTC

Authored by
Every article published on DirectionFreeNews undergoes editorial review by our editorial team. Our editors research publicly available information from multiple trusted news organizations, compare differing perspectives, verify key facts, and publish balanced summaries intended to help readers better understand important events. Our editorial process is designed to reduce editorial bias by considering multiple reputable sources rather than relying on a single viewpoint

Rafizi Ramli, Malaysia's Minister of Economy, cautioned on Thursday that a slowdown in domestic natural‑gas production could push electricity tariffs higher in the coming months. The warning follows recent data from the Energy Commission showing a 7% drop in gas output from the country's offshore fields between January and June 2024.

Malaysia generates roughly 60% of its electricity from natural‑gas‑fired power plants. A contraction in gas supply forces the utility Tenaga Nasional Berhad (TNB) to rely more on imported liquefied natural gas (LNG) and, in extreme cases, on coal‑based generation, both of which carry higher marginal costs. Analysts estimate that each 1% reduction in gas availability could add up to 0.3 sen per kilowatt‑hour to the average household bill.

Rafizi emphasized that the government is monitoring the situation closely and will consider adjustments to the tariff formula if the supply gap widens further. He also noted that the Ministry of Economy is working with Petronas and the Energy Commission to accelerate new gas field development and explore alternative renewable sources.

Economic and Market Impact

The immediate economic impact is likely to be felt in the residential and commercial sectors, where higher electricity costs can erode disposable income and increase operating expenses. Small‑ and medium‑sized enterprises that rely on continuous power for manufacturing may see profit margins tighten, prompting some to delay expansion plans. On the broader market, higher tariffs could affect Malaysia's competitiveness in energy‑intensive industries such as electronics and automotive parts.

Political and Community Impact

Politically, the warning adds pressure on the ruling coalition ahead of the 2025 state elections, especially in low‑income constituencies where utility bills represent a larger share of household spending. Community groups have already begun voicing concerns about the affordability of electricity, calling for targeted subsidies or price caps to protect vulnerable households.

What Happens Next

The Energy Commission is scheduled to release a quarterly supply outlook in early October, which will indicate whether the gas shortfall persists. If the outlook confirms a continued decline, the Ministry of Economy is expected to submit a tariff revision proposal to the regulator within the next two months. Stakeholders are watching for any policy measures, such as temporary subsidies or accelerated renewable‑energy incentives, that could mitigate the impact of higher electricity prices.

Potential Benefits / Supporting Perspective

Potential Benefits of Securing Gas Supply to Stabilize Electricity Prices

A proactive approach to stabilising Malaysia's gas supply can deliver several tangible benefits for the economy and consumers. By accelerating the development of new offshore gas fields and fast‑tracking approvals for domestic drilling projects, the government can reduce reliance on costly imported LNG. Lower import dependence would keep generation costs down, allowing Tenaga Nasional Berhad to maintain current tariff rates.

Ensuring a reliable gas pipeline also supports the country's broader energy transition goals. Stable gas availability provides a bridge to renewable sources, allowing intermittent solar and wind power to be integrated without jeopardising grid reliability. This continuity can attract foreign investment in clean‑energy projects, as investors view a predictable fuel mix as a lower‑risk environment.

From a fiscal perspective, avoiding a tariff hike protects household disposable income, especially for low‑ and middle‑income families that allocate a larger share of their budget to utilities. Maintaining affordable electricity helps sustain consumer spending in other sectors, contributing to overall economic growth. Moreover, businesses—particularly small and medium enterprises—benefit from predictable operating costs, reducing the need to pass higher energy expenses onto customers.

Finally, a clear policy roadmap that outlines gas‑supply security measures can enhance public confidence in the government's ability to manage essential services. Transparent communication about project timelines, expected output, and contingency plans can mitigate speculation and market volatility, fostering a more stable economic environment.

Potential Drawbacks / Critical Perspective

Potential Drawbacks of Rising Electricity Prices on Malaysian Households

While the government cites gas‑supply constraints as a driver of possible tariff increases, the prospect of higher electricity bills poses serious risks for vulnerable populations. Low‑income families already spend a significant portion of their income on utilities; an additional 0.3 to 0.5 sen per kilowatt‑hour could translate into hundreds of ringgit per year, pushing some households toward energy poverty.

Higher electricity costs also have a cascading effect on essential services. Schools, clinics, and community centers that rely on subsidised rates may face budget shortfalls, forcing them to curtail operating hours or defer maintenance. In the private sector, cost‑sensitive industries such as textile manufacturing could see reduced competitiveness, potentially leading to job losses or slower wage growth.

Critics argue that the government's response—primarily focusing on gas‑supply augmentation—does not address the structural issue of tariff design. Without targeted subsidies or tiered pricing that shields low‑consumption users, the burden of price hikes will fall disproportionately on those least able to absorb them. Moreover, rapid adjustments to the tariff formula risk creating market uncertainty, which could deter investment in both the energy sector and downstream industries.

Stakeholders are calling for a more balanced strategy that combines supply‑side measures with demand‑side interventions, such as energy‑efficiency programmes, rebates for low‑income households, and accelerated rollout of renewable micro‑grids in rural areas. These actions could mitigate the immediate financial shock while laying groundwork for a more resilient, affordable power system.