Questioning Singapore's Vape Seizures: Are the Penalties Proportional?

While Singapore's right to set its own drug and tobacco laws is not in question, the recent seizure of over 444 vapes from 56 travellers raises concerns about proportionality and practicality. The law bans all vaping devices, yet many travellers come from countries where vapes are legal and widely used. A first-time traveller who forgets a vape in their bag can face a fine and confiscation, which seems harsh for a minor, non-violent infraction. Moreover, the resources poured into checkpoint blitzes could arguably be better spent on other health priorities, such as smoking cessation services for the 10% of adults who still smoke traditional cigarettes. Critics also note that the ban may drive a black market for vapes, making enforcement more difficult over time. Rather than absolute prohibition, a regulated system with age restrictions and quality controls could reduce harms without punishing casual travellers. Some public health experts argue that vaping, while not risk-free, is less harmful than smoking and could serve as a harm reduction tool for those unable to quit. By treating vapes the same as illegal drugs, Singapore may miss an opportunity to reduce overall smoking rates. The current approach may also alienate tourists and business travellers, who may choose other destinations rather than risk a fine for an honest mistake.