Critics caution that the push for AI-enhanced productivity is creating a stressful work culture for Gen Z. When employers raise expectations based on what AI can achieve, they risk setting unrealistic targets that disregard human limits. Workers may feel compelled to work longer hours or constantly monitor new tools to keep up.
In Singapore, where workers already report higher levels of wariness, this pressure could backfire. Studies show that constant use of AI tools can lead to cognitive overload and reduced job satisfaction. There is also concern about employee surveillance, as some companies use AI to track productivity metrics, eroding trust.
Another risk is the widening gap between those who can adapt to AI and those who cannot. Younger workers may thrive, but older colleagues or those with less access to training could be left behind. This could create a two-tier workforce in Asia, with implications for social cohesion.
Furthermore, an over-reliance on AI may stunt the development of critical thinking and problem-solving skills that come from doing tasks manually. Employers must ask whether short-term productivity gains are worth the long-term costs to human capital and workplace culture. Without strong safeguards, the AI productivity push may do more harm than good.