Questioning the severity of the fine for a social media stunt

Published July 30, 2026 at 8:04 AM UTC

Authored by

Key Points

Debate over the severity of the S$600 fine
Incident was a staged social media stunt
No direct harm caused; straw not used by public
Raises questions about balance between enforcement and appropriate penalties

Background History

The incident involving Maximilien, a French student in Singapore, sparked widespread public concern after he filmed himself licking a straw from an iJooz vending machine and returned it to the dispenser. The video went viral, leading to charges of mischief and public nuisance. Maximilien pleaded guilty and was fined S$600. The debate centers on whether the fine is appropriate for a non-malicious act intended for online entertainment.

While the act of licking a straw from a vending machine is unhygienic, some argue that the S$600 fine for Didier Gaspard Owen Maximilien is disproportionate. The incident was a staged social media stunt with no direct harm caused, and the contaminated straw was not used by the public. Critics suggest that the punishment may be excessive for a non-malicious act intended for online entertainment. This raises questions about the balance between enforcing public hygiene and ensuring that penalties are appropriate for the severity of the offense.