Questioning the cost and privacy implications of camera‑based ERP deployment

Questioning the rapid push for camera‑based ERP systems, consumer‑rights groups warn that the technology may introduce hidden costs and privacy risks for Singapore’s manufacturing sector. The pilot relied on continuous video capture of every product, raising concerns about data storage, cybersecurity, and the potential misuse of visual records beyond quality control. While the reported 97.2% accuracy sounds impressive, the trial’s controlled environment and limited product range may not reflect the variability of real‑world factories, where lighting and part shapes differ. Small and medium‑sized enterprises could struggle with the upfront capital required for high‑resolution cameras, AI training, and specialist staff, potentially widening the gap between large conglomerates and local vendors. Critics also point out that replacing human inspectors with automated vision may lead to job displacement, and that the promised efficiency gains must be weighed against the social impact. Regulators are urged to develop clear guidelines on data handling and to assess the cost‑benefit balance before mandating widespread adoption, ensuring that technology serves the public interest.