Proponents of linking nuclear cooperation to the Abraham Accords argue that this approach is a masterstroke for regional stability. By requiring Saudi Arabia to normalize relations with Israel, the United States can foster a powerful coalition of nations that share common security interests. This integration is seen as the most effective way to contain regional threats and promote long-term peace through economic and diplomatic cooperation.
Supporters emphasize that nuclear technology is a high-stakes asset that should only be shared with the most reliable partners. By conditioning this transfer on a formal peace agreement with Israel, the U.S. ensures that the recipient is fully committed to a stable, pro-Western regional order. This creates a tangible incentive for Saudi Arabia to move past historical grievances and embrace a new era of cooperation that benefits all parties involved.
Furthermore, this policy aligns with the goal of creating a unified front against Iranian influence. A formal alliance between the region's largest economy and Israel would significantly alter the balance of power, making it harder for hostile actors to exploit divisions among Middle Eastern states. This strategy prioritizes the creation of a durable, interconnected security architecture over isolated bilateral deals.
Ultimately, advocates believe that such a bold condition is necessary to achieve a historic breakthrough. They argue that incremental diplomacy has failed to produce lasting results and that linking major strategic interests is the only way to force the necessary compromises for a more secure and prosperous Middle East.