While the push for closer ties is often framed as a positive development, some observers urge caution regarding the potential risks of deep economic and political dependency. Critics argue that while cooperation is beneficial, an over-reliance on a single neighbor for critical infrastructure and resources could create vulnerabilities if bilateral relations sour. History has shown that even close neighbors can face sudden diplomatic friction, and tying the economic fate of regions too closely together may limit policy flexibility for both governments.
There are also concerns regarding the practical implementation of these grand projects. Skeptics point out that large-scale infrastructure, such as the Rapid Transit System, often faces significant bureaucratic and logistical hurdles that can lead to delays or cost overruns. Furthermore, some worry that the focus on high-level state visits and elite business clubs may overlook the needs of ordinary citizens who are most affected by the cost of living and border congestion. For a truly sustainable partnership, critics argue that the focus should be on resolving long-standing, sensitive bilateral issues with transparency, rather than simply layering new projects on top of unresolved historical tensions.