While the Dewan Keadilan dan Undang has moved to settle the royal crisis, some observers remain cautious about the long-term impact of these interventions on Negeri Sembilan’s traditional customs. The rapid dismissal of customary chiefs and the invalidation of their actions raise questions about the balance of power between the ruler and the traditional territorial leaders. Critics argue that when the royal institution becomes deeply involved in the internal disputes of the Undang, it risks appearing as though it is consolidating power rather than merely acting as an impartial arbiter of custom.
The involvement of political figures in the background of this crisis has further complicated public perception. With the revocation of royal honors for opposition figures and the timing of these decisions just before an election, there are concerns that the royal institution is being drawn into the partisan fray. This creates a risk that the monarchy, which is traditionally expected to remain above politics, could be perceived as taking sides in the state's electoral competition. Such a perception could potentially alienate segments of the population and weaken the unifying role the ruler is meant to play.
Moreover, the reliance on the 1959 Constitution to resolve disputes rooted in centuries-old Adat Perpatih highlights a potential friction between modern legal frameworks and traditional practices. If the procedures for removing or appointing chiefs are seen as being dictated by the palace rather than through the consensus-based processes of the local communities, it may lead to lingering resentment or challenges to the legitimacy of the new appointments. Ensuring that these decisions are viewed as fair and consistent with the spirit of the customs is essential to maintaining public trust in the state's unique leadership structure.