Critics of Dr. Muhamad Akmal Saleh argue that his use of the term “nyonya tua” and his suggestion to place a non-halal logo on Teresa Kok’s forehead represent a dangerous decline in the quality of Malaysian political discourse. Opponents, including members of the DAP and other civil society groups, have condemned the remarks as sexist, misogynistic, and inherently dehumanizing. They contend that such language is not a legitimate form of political criticism but rather a personal attack designed to demean a female politician based on her age and gender. By resorting to name-calling instead of engaging in a factual debate about the merits of halal certification, critics argue that Akmal has set a poor example for the nation’s youth and damaged the standard of public conduct.
Beyond the personal impact on Kok, observers warn that this rhetoric exacerbates racial and religious tensions in a multi-ethnic society. Critics point out that using such labels can incite hostility and distract from the actual policy issues, such as the economic burden of mandatory certification on small businesses. By turning a policy discussion into a polemic, Akmal is accused of prioritizing political gain over national harmony. The decision to pursue a defamation lawsuit is viewed by these critics as a vital step toward holding public officials accountable for their speech and ensuring that political disagreements remain within the bounds of respectful and constructive debate.