Critics argue that the agreement between Hamas and Israel, despite its historic nature, faces significant hurdles in implementation. Israel's insistence on Hamas's complete disarmament before full withdrawal reflects deep-seated security fears. The protracted timeline of 200–250 days for disarmament and the complexities involved may lead to delays and potential setbacks.
The new technocratic Palestinian committee faces internal resistance and skepticism from various factions, complicating governance and reconstruction efforts. The exclusion of both Hamas and the Palestinian Authority from the NCAG raises questions about legitimacy and effectiveness. Additionally, the reliance on international forces to monitor security transitions creates dependency and potential sovereignty concerns.
There are concerns that the promise of a Palestinian state, which Israel currently opposes, could stall progress or reignite tensions. Political obstacles, coupled with the fragile regional dynamics, may undermine the agreement's success and prolong instability in Gaza.
Nevertheless, ongoing negotiations and international involvement remain crucial to managing these challenges and striving for a peaceful resolution.