Proponents of the government's decision to maintain the ban on 'Satluj' argue that the state has a fundamental duty to prevent the dissemination of content that could incite unrest or undermine national integrity. Supporters emphasize that the film, which deals with a highly sensitive period of Punjab's history, carries the potential to be exploited by external or hostile elements aiming to disturb public order. From this viewpoint, the government's intervention is a necessary exercise of its authority under the IT Rules, 2021, to ensure that digital media does not become a tool for destabilization.
Advocates for this position point out that the film's release without the standard certification process—after years of unresolved disputes with the Central Board of Film Certification—bypassed established safeguards designed to balance creative expression with social harmony. By invoking Section 69A of the IT Act, the government is acting within its legal mandate to address content that it deems a threat to the sovereignty of the nation. For these stakeholders, the priority is maintaining peace and preventing the revival of volatile historical narratives that could jeopardize current security efforts in the region. They argue that responsible regulation is essential in an era where digital platforms can reach vast audiences instantly, making the potential impact of inflammatory content significantly higher than in traditional media.