Critics of the current political arrangement argue that the alliance between Pakatan Harapan and Barisan Nasional is fundamentally flawed and lacks a cohesive vision. They contend that the partnership was born out of political convenience rather than shared values, making it inherently fragile. This skepticism is rooted in the observation that the two parties have historically held opposing ideologies, which makes it difficult to reach a consensus on critical national policies.
From this perspective, the talk of cabinet resignations is a symptom of deeper, unresolved tensions that threaten to paralyze the government. Critics warn that when a government is preoccupied with internal power struggles, it loses its ability to address the pressing needs of the people. They argue that the public is being left behind as political leaders focus on maintaining their own positions and managing the delicate balance of power within the coalition.
There is also a concern regarding the lack of accountability in a government where former rivals are now partners. Opponents suggest that this arrangement limits the role of the opposition and creates a situation where there is little incentive for the government to improve its performance. The risk, according to this view, is that the administration will become stagnant, failing to implement the necessary changes that voters expected when they went to the polls.
Ultimately, those questioning the alliance believe that the current situation is unsustainable and that a more transparent and ideologically consistent government is needed. They argue that the constant threat of cabinet departures creates an environment of uncertainty that discourages long-term planning. For these critics, the focus should shift toward ensuring that the government remains accountable to the public, rather than merely focusing on the survival of the coalition itself.