While the government has pledged to retain a portion of Maju Forest, the decision to clear two-thirds of the site raises significant concerns about the long-term impact on Singapore's biodiversity. Critics and nature advocates argue that even with mitigation measures, the loss of 15 hectares of secondary forest represents a permanent reduction in habitat for species that rely on these interconnected green spaces. The presence of endangered animals, such as the Sunda pangolin, underscores the ecological value of the area, which serves as a critical link between larger nature reserves.
There is a growing skepticism regarding whether 'retained' forest patches can truly function as effective habitats once they are fragmented by high-density residential developments. When forests are reduced to small, isolated pockets, they often lose their ability to support the complex ecosystems that previously thrived there. The proximity to human activity, noise, and light pollution can create an environment that is less conducive to the survival of shy, sensitive wildlife, potentially forcing them into less suitable areas or increasing the risk of human-wildlife conflict.
Accountability remains a central issue for those calling for stronger safeguards. While environmental impact assessments and stakeholder consultations are positive steps, they often serve to justify development rather than prevent it. Critics argue that the focus should shift toward prioritizing the protection of existing green corridors over the convenience of developing greenfield sites. Without more robust protections, the cumulative loss of these secondary forests could undermine Singapore's broader environmental goals and diminish the natural heritage available to future generations.